Why You Should be Skeptical of Science Headlines

Amy Tuteur has an important post over at Science-Based Medicine that you really should take the time to read. In a nutshell, she points out the problems with accepting the LATEST AND GREATEST SCIENCE DISCOVERY OF ALL TIME headlines that media organizations and (some) journalists love to put out there as a way to get attention.

Very much worth the read. And the next time someone tells you that red wine will make you live forever or that some breakthrough new drug is going to cure all of our metaphysical ills with a small pill, you owe yourself some followup to determine if there is actual science behind the claim or if it’s all just bread and circuses.

Most people are unaware that scientists issue press releases about their work and they are certainly unaware that medical journalists often copy them word for word. Instead of presenting an accurate representation of medical research, medical journalists have become complicit in transmitting inaccurate or deceptive “puff pieces” designed to hype the supposed discovery and hide any deficiencies in the research.

Link

Powered by ScribeFire.

The Future, Gay Penguins, and Other Tidbits

When we have a watch that can do video calling, eyeware that can display interactive menus based on eye movement, and signals from outer space, you know that the future is upon us.

Meanwhile, gay penguins raise a family, women are just as good at math as men, men are selfish pigs, and if you think you are a rebel and march to the beat of your own drum, so do 75% of other people.

Inspirational moments include a seven-year-old boy who suggested how to save a Mars Rover, learning for learning’s sake is easier than ever before in human history, and them pictures sure are pretty.


Podcasts for Smart People – Welcome to Mars

Between 1947 and 1959, the future was written about, discussed and analysed with such confidence that it became a tangible presence. This is a story of weird science, strange events and even stranger beliefs, set in an age when the possibilities for human development seemed almost limitless. (Link)

I first discovered Ken Hollings’ Welcome to Mars on Boing Boing and can’t recommend this show enough to anyone who is curious about the intersections of science, popular culture, science fiction, and the nooks and crannies of American history from 1947 – 1959. From government agencies setting up brothels in San Francisco to test various combinations of psychedelic drugs, to UFOs, to the creation of suburbia, Hollings takes you on a ride through the kind of history that you won’t find in textbooks or in a Ken Burns documentary. Subtitled “On the Fantasy of Science in the American Half-century,” the series begins with an examination of Levittown, the very first of the modern suburbs and weaves a narrative that is both compelling and somewhat disturbing. Hollings’ narrative is also underscored by the electronic music of Simon James; music that alternates between haunting and jarring. On first listen, the music may seem extraneous, intrusive, or just plain annoying. In part, because Hollings’ story is so damn intriguing that whenever the music pulls focus, you think to yourself “get back to the real part of the podcast, I want to hear what’s next.” On second listen, however, the music and sounds of Simon James, these odd and jangling, ethereal and robotic sounds become a part of the narrative. James provides a non-verbal commentary that weaves together the various fantasies of science and culture that Hollings reveals.

This show tapped into my personal reservoir of interest in UFOs, science fiction and science fact. From fantasies of government conspiracy to conspiracies of government fantasy to the desperate desire for alien actuality, I have—since childhood and my reading about Betty and Barney Frank, the Loch Ness monster, Bigfoot, and the Bermuda Triangle—been intrigued and excited by questions of the paranormal, cryptozoology, and the possibilities of aliens among us. What sets Hollings’ discussion apart from the typical kooky claims, is that he approaches these subjects as a web of cultural and socio-political inferences. For Hollings, the question isn’t “do UFOs exist?” but rather “what does it mean for a culture to believe, disbelieve, and variously represent the existence of UFOs?” As an erstwhile academic influenced by performance studies and feminism, I believe that the connections between government policies, movies, television, architecture, music, and popular representations of science are tremendously important in the attempt to understand ourselves. Hollings offers a snapshot of culture that reveals a number of aspects of the American consciousness that, on the surface of things, may seems trivial, but are, in fact, the very warp and woof of our national identity.

Welcome to Mars is a twelve part series, with each show about thirty minutes in length. If you are anything like me, you’ll probably devour the series in only two or three sittings as you fall down a rabbit hole and find yourself in a strange world that is our own but that is refracted and off-kilter. Like how, when you put your finger underwater, your vision doesn’t quite match up with your physicality. A world of interconnections that rebuild your perceptions about American history and our cultural relationship to science fiction and science fact.

iTunes Link

Website Link

Hollings also published a book version of the podcast that is available on Amazon, Powells, or through Strange Attractor Press.

Sharing Some Stuff With You Because Gosh I Like You

Abandoned buildings, melted bricks, and a city’s despair: photo essays from a variety of sources, via BoingBoing.

You want some future? How about viruses as batteries, bionic eyes, surveillance that would put Big Brother to shame, and a whole new meaning to the phrase, there’s gold in them thar hills.

Need a break from reading? Check these out:

Dancing Science Thesis Project:
s

This is Science: Helena Reynolds from Matthew Chaboud on Vimeo.

In the Beatle’s Footsteps:

Short CGI animated film that’s long on talent and cool concepts:

Hemlock from Tyson Ibele on Vimeo.

Dinosaurs and a Changing World

From the Discovery Channel:

Sauropod dinosaurs — the group including the well-known Apatosaurus (formerly known as Brontosaurus) — could not have kept their long necks in a vertical position, according to a new study. (Link)

I think one of the reasons people distrust science is that it forces us to constantly reevaluate our knowledge and sometimes, like in the case of Pluto’s reclassification, or new evidence about dinosaurs, change things that we fondly remember from childhood.

While a lot of us think that science is exciting for just these same reasons, for some it’s scary that the world isn’t a fixed and static point of knowledge.



Great Links of Fire!

Auguste points out why those of the reactionary, conservative, and wingnut variety are so terrified of offering a fair and even playing field to the American people.

If you could play Scrabble on your iPhone with friends using Facebook, would you? Or are we reaching a point of digital saturation in our lives?

Way to go Vermont. Keep up the good work. (via Pandagon)

The CNN article states that “Nationwide, the issue of same-sex marriage remains highly divisive.” Giving poll numbers that indicate 53% of American’s are opposed to it. I’d be interested to know what the poll numbers were in Massachusetts and Connecticut before same-sex marriage was legal and after. Is there a shift in people’s perspective after seeing that same-sex marriage hasn’t had a negative impact? I also find it interesting that states in New England, with the history of Puritanism in the region, are leading the nation in doing what is socially right and just.

Academic Earth: a digital archive of educational lectures. Fer makin’ yous more smartter. Seriously though, how awesome is this!

Wow. Just wow. These are the coolest photographs of waves I’ve ever seen. (via BoingBoing)

For iPhone users a super-cheap iPhone stand that fits in a wallet.

I could have told them that! (Not, you know, with any scientific evidence or anything.)

And speaking of the brain . . .

Do you need free stock photography for a project? (via Lifehacker)

Jesse makes a good point.

Good advice (via BoingBoing)