Seriously, we need to have a Science Fiction Film Festival for Scientsts

 Sitebuildercontent Sitebuilderpictures Mtnw Island

I mean, we all know where this is heading:

Craig Venter, the controversial DNA researcher involved in the race to decipher the human genetic code, has built a synthetic chromosome out of laboratory chemicals and is poised to announce the creation of the first new artificial life form on Earth.

Of course, that’s not really the problem, it’s the next bit that leads to the extinction of the human race.

The DNA sequence is based on the bacterium Mycoplasma genitalium which the team pared down to the bare essentials needed to support life, removing a fifth of its genetic make-up. The wholly synthetically reconstructed chromosome, which the team have christened Mycoplasma laboratorium, has been watermarked with inks for easy recognition. It is then transplanted into a living bacterial cell and in the final stage of the process it is expected to take control of the cell and in effect become a new life form. The team of scientists has already successfully transplanted the genome of one type of bacterium into the cell of another, effectively changing the cell’s species. Mr Venter said he was “100% confident” the same technique would work for the artificially created chromosome.

Has he never read or seen any of a bajillion science fiction books or movies that tell us what will happen when this artificial bacteria mutates into something that starts to kill us all? I am all for science and knowledge and learning stuff, but this can only end badly.

Unless the robots take over first and download us into the mainframe. In which case, bacteria-shmacteria! I’ll be matrixing all over the place with a cool wardrobe, cool shades, sexy companions, and superhuman powers.

Link (via Engadget)

For a picture of the future – follow this link.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for President . . . of the United States of America?

 44135958 Leader Ap203Bo If the Republican Party is searching for a candidate that appeals to their religious conservative base, they need look no further. According to sources who are close to the Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has expressed interest in a possible run for Republican nomination in the 2008 election. When asked about the Constitutional requirement of being a natural born citizen, he merely smiled that impish smile of his and said, “I don’t think I’ll need to worry too much about the Constitution, God is so much greater than a piece of paper. On that, you know, your President Bush and I are in complete agreement..” Why the Republican Party? A confidential source close to both Ahmadinejad and largest funders of the Republican party spoke to LtL on condition on anonymity:

Let me put it this way, we don’t believe in gays. He doesn’t believe in gays. We believe in capital punishment, he believes in capital punishment. We want to return the natural order of the sexes back into our communities, ridding women of the terrible burdens they carry because of feminism. Ahmadinejad also recognizes that it’s best when women are exempt from the many legal responsibilities that should be shouldered by men. Like, you know, voting and control of their own bodies.

Sounds positively Coulter.

Officially, the Republican Party has refused to comment on Ahmadinejad’s chances of getting the nomination, but Norman Reed, a 54 year old life-long Republican and once campaign worker for David Duke put it this way:

I’d rather have a God-fearing Sand Nigger as President than one of those Godless-communist-fags in the Democratic party, or that fruit lovin’ New Yawk city twerp. And don’t get me started on that Morman pretty boy.

Ahmadinejad may be a long shot for the nomination, but his peculiar brand of religious zealotry, misogynism, racism, intolerance, and support of the death penalty as well as a strong, inflexible patriarchal social order may be just the ticket to garner the support of those who feel betrayed by the Republican Party. Further evidence in the increasing link between Ahmadinejad and the Religious Right in the US lies in the following statement:

We again read in the Holy Book: the Almighty God sent His prophets with miracles and clear signs to guide the people and show them divine signs and purity them from sins and pollutions. And He sent the Book and the balance so that the people display justice and avoid the rebellious.

Ahmadinejad or American Family Association?

Technorati Tags: , , ,

The Most Intense Voice Around: Diamanda Galas

The first time I heard Diamanda Galas was in a car, driving through the fog at 2 am, listening to her Plague Mass being played on WRIU. Freaked me the fuck out – wasn’t sure if I was hearing a human or a demon or an angel.

I’ve seen her live twice and both times have been struck nearly dumb by the power of her voice. A reviewer for the Providence Phoenix said that she does for the human voice what Miles Davis did for the trumpet. My buddy Jay is the only person I know who adores her work as much as I do, and this post is dedicated to him and the hope that we will go see her perform live again one of these days.

This is not music you put on while you do the dishes. This is music that requires all of your attention. If I were in a poetic mood, I would go so far as to say that it requires a significant portion of your soul (although several of her blues albums are fairly accessible and don’t rip your mind to too many shreds).

If that hasn’t scared you away and if you feel brave, you can check out this piece which presents two excerpts from her work “Eyes Without Blood” – if the first video highlights the beautiful power of her voice, the deep reverberating sadness that lies at the heart of much of her work, this one shows the demonic – the sheer inhuman power that stabs into your gut with a knife of impossibly cold metal . . . then twists.

I swear, these are the sounds that must have erupted from the fallen angels as they descended into hell.*

I met her after one of her concerts and she was far more open and less scary than you might think from her performances. I told her that I wished I had something more than applause to give her because applause seemed somehow inappropriate. It may seem a pretentious thing to say, but her performances are so intense, so deeply there that you feel like clapping afterward is cheap and tawdry.

One of the oddest collaborations must be the album she did with John Paul Jones, the bassist from Led Zeppelin. It is one of her most accessible albums and this is one of the most laid back of the songs:

While her work is certainly not for everyone, I honestly can’t think of a more powerful vocal performer. If you want to open yourself to an experience that is truly sublime–in the Kantian sense–and that will reveal a raw, palpable and bleeding humanity, take a deep breath, turn the stereo up and let yourself be surrounded and penetrated by a voice that is more than human.

  • Literarily, not literally speaking.

Technorati Tags: , ,

An Impressionist Review of Paul Auster’s The Book of Illusions

This is the kind of book that punches you, not unkindly, in the gut. A book about loss and redemption, sure. That’s the easy stuff kiddo. Death is almost a necessity for novelists – I mean, without death, what would the motivation for so many stories be? Auster presents another kind of death in his novel The Book of Illusions. The kind like in Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler when Hedda burn’s Lovborg’s manuscript and cries out “I am burning your child.” The kind of death that makes writers gasp and artists cringe. At the center of Auster’s book is a crime that is larger than murder: destroying art.

And it made me feel physically ill. That’s how good this book is.

Auster writes with a precision that borders the lyrical, yet never really crosses over to the poetic. His prose is like a marathon runner, lean, stringy, taut. Because he reveals only what is necessary about his characters, they feel, paradoxically, more tangible than many other characters from fiction. He accomplishes in prose what I find I look for in theatre: a coolness in his characters, a reserve that may crack here and there, but that, in the end, never manages to break the dam down. As a reader, I am left with the feeling that I have spent considerable time with a number of fascinating people. And, as in “real” life, I am left with only glimpses of those people, with only shards of glass that partially reflect the whole mirror. Just as the knowledge of my co-workers, colleagues, acquaintances, friends, and lovers is always partial and limited, refracted through a narrow prism to reveal discrete colors that never, in the end, reveal everything, Auster’s characters are broken, disjointed, incomplete. Auster is not interested in attempting to fully reveal a character’s inner world and, because of this, he creates characters that are so damn intriguing you find yourself almost jumping into the fiction, eager to go with these creations and at the same time catching sight of yourself along the way.

Sometimes it is not a pretty sight.

The key to this novel, as I said before, is an act of artistic destruction. This destruction is so pure, so beyond understanding that you find yourself forgetting to breathe. As suspicion of what is to occur grows within you, you start to shiver. No, you say. No, he won’t do that to these people, not after all they’ve been through. He can’t.

He does.

There is a sense of the truly tragic in this book. The notion that, at any time, the character’s could have changed the outcome. Oedipus could have walked away from a fight on the crossroads, Agamemnon could have refused to sacrifice his daughter and come home with a concubine. The Book of Illusion has no illusions about could’ve should’ve would’ve and, moment by moment, the characters walk toward a destiny that is appallingly logical. Inhuman, yes, but completely, inevitably logical.

Read it, but don’t expect to read it lightly.

Currently Listening: Ulrich Schnauss – Knuddelmaus

Technorati Tags: , ,